FIROJ @ FIROJ ALAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 346/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006932026

Filing Number

522/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

346/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

GOALPUKHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FIROJ @ FIROJ ALAM

    Adv. PRATAP KAR

  2. 2.SAKIR @ SAKIR ALAM

  3. 3.SAHID @ SAHID ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Firoj Alam, Sakir Alam, and Sahid Alam) under section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304(2), 324(4), 329(3), and 351(2) B.N.S. The court found insufficient material against these petitioners in the FIR, which primarily named other accused, and noted investigative lapses including failure to collect injury reports despite significant time elapsed. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 6,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Firoj Alam, Sakir Alam, and Sahid Alam) under section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304(2), 324(4), 329(3), and 351(2) B.N.S. The court found insufficient material against these petitioners in the FIR, which primarily named other accused, and noted investigative lapses including failure to collect injury reports despite significant time elapsed. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 6,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case