FIROJ @ FIROJ ALAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 346/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010006932026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
522/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
346/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
GOALPUKHAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FIROJ @ FIROJ ALAM
Adv. PRATAP KAR
SAKIR @ SAKIR ALAM
SAHID @ SAHID ALAM
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Firoj Alam, Sakir Alam, and Sahid Alam) under section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304(2), 324(4), 329(3), and 351(2) B.N.S. The court found insufficient material against these petitioners in the FIR, which primarily named other accused, and noted investigative lapses including failure to collect injury reports despite significant time elapsed. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 6,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Firoj Alam, Sakir Alam, and Sahid Alam) under section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304(2), 324(4), 329(3), and 351(2) B.N.S. The court found insufficient material against these petitioners in the FIR, which primarily named other accused, and noted investigative lapses including failure to collect injury reports despite significant time elapsed. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 6,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts