PALASH BARMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 342/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006892026

Filing Number

518/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

342/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

155

Police Station

KALIYAGANJ

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALASH BARMAN

    Adv. BHOLANATH BARMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted bail to accused Palash Barman in a case involving unlawful assembly and obstruction of police duties related to a girl's death. The court allowed the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S, setting bail at Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, reasoning that since the investigation was complete and the charge sheet already filed, further custodial detention was unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted bail to accused Palash Barman in a case involving unlawful assembly and obstruction of police duties related to a girl's death. The court allowed the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S, setting bail at Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, reasoning that since the investigation was complete and the charge sheet already filed, further custodial detention was unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case