DULAL SING @ PRODIP SINGHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 334/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006612026

Filing Number

504/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

334/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DULAL SING @ PRODIP SINGHA

    Adv. KARIMUL KABIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to Dulal Sing @ Pradip Singha in a kidnapping case (Itahar P.S. Case No.131/2026). The court found that while the victim is a minor, her statement recorded under B.N.S.S indicates she voluntarily eloped with the accused, and custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 334/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to Dulal Sing @ Pradip Singha in a kidnapping case (Itahar P.S. Case No.131/2026). The court found that while the victim is a minor, her statement recorded under B.N.S.S indicates she voluntarily eloped with the accused, and custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. The accused was released on bail of Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case