SAHEB @ SAHEB ALAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 330/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed in part on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010006572026
Filing Number
500/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
330/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed in part
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAHEB @ SAHEB ALAM
Adv. PRATAP KAR
BHUTTI @ ISRAIL @ MD ISRAIL
ANJANA @ ANJUNA KHATUN
SARMILI @ ISRAT BANU
PARBEEN @ ISHRAT PERVEEN
RUKSAR @ RUKSAR BEGUM
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners 1-2 (Saheb Alam and Md Israil) due to direct allegations of assault against them and minor injuries to the victim. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners 3-6 (Anjana Khatun, Israt Banu, Ishrat Parveen, and Ruksar Begum) as no material evidence implicated them, with bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners 1-2 (Saheb Alam and Md Israil) due to direct allegations of assault against them and minor injuries to the victim. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners 3-6 (Anjana Khatun, Israt Banu, Ishrat Parveen, and Ruksar Begum) as no material evidence implicated them, with bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts