EKBAL @ TENKU @ IKBAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 329/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006562026

Filing Number

499/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EKBAL @ TENKU @ IKBAL

    Adv. PRATAP KAR

  2. 2.TAUSIF @ TOSIB

  3. 3.TOHIN @ TOHID

  4. 4.SAIRA @ SAIRA KHATUN

  5. 5.TESLIMA @ TASLIMA KHATUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four of the five petitioners (Ekbal, Tausif, Saira Khatun, and Teslima Khatun) in an assault case, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation given the victim's simple injuries and lack of specific allegations against most petitioners. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 8,000 bond with surety, subject to meeting the investigating officer weekly and cooperating with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four of the five petitioners (Ekbal, Tausif, Saira Khatun, and Teslima Khatun) in an assault case, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation given the victim's simple injuries and lack of specific allegations against most petitioners. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 8,000 bond with surety, subject to meeting the investigating officer weekly and cooperating with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case