HUMAYUN RASID MIYA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006232026

Filing Number

472/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

315/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

RAIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HUMAYUN RASID MIYA

    Adv. DIPAK DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Humayun Rasid Miya, finding the allegations against him—including mental and physical torture, and causing miscarriage—to be of a serious nature. The court determined that granting bail at this stage would risk witness intimidation and interference with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Humayun Rasid Miya, finding the allegations against him—including mental and physical torture, and causing miscarriage—to be of a serious nature. The court determined that granting bail at this stage would risk witness intimidation and interference with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case