FAIM HABIB MIAH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 314/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006222026

Filing Number

471/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

RAIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIM HABIB MIAH

    Adv. DIPAK DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Faim Habib Miah under Section 482 of BNSS in connection with serious allegations of torture and sexual assault. The court found the charges grave and determined that granting bail would risk witness intimidation and interference with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Faim Habib Miah under Section 482 of BNSS in connection with serious allegations of torture and sexual assault. The court found the charges grave and determined that granting bail would risk witness intimidation and interference with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case