PALANU PAUL ALIAS PALANU PAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 311/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010006132026
Filing Number
464/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
311/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
164
Police Station
ITAHAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PALANU PAUL ALIAS PALANU PAL
Adv. Ashok Das
-
2.PAYEL PAUL ALIAS PAYEL SAHA
-
3.PATO PAUL ALIAS PATO PAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Palanu Paul, Payel Paul, and Pato Paul) in connection with Itahar P.S. Case No.164/2026. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since the primary charge (sec.109 B.N.S.) lacked supporting material in the FIR and the victim sustained only simple injuries. Each petitioner was released on Rs.3,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 311/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Palanu Paul, Payel Paul, and Pato Paul) in connection with Itahar P.S. Case No.164/2026. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since the primary charge (sec.109 B.N.S.) lacked supporting material in the FIR and the victim sustained only simple injuries. Each petitioner was released on Rs.3,000 bail bond with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts