SHANKAR MAHATO vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 304/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010006042026

Filing Number

455/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

304/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

RAIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR MAHATO

    Adv. SUBIR SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Khajim, Nuresha, Ajmira, Sima, and Minu) in a case involving charges under sections 109/85/3(5) B.N.S. The court found no material evidence to support the allegations against them, noted the absence of a victim injury report, and concluded that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 2,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Khajim, Nuresha, Ajmira, Sima, and Minu) in a case involving charges under sections 109/85/3(5) B.N.S. The court found no material evidence to support the allegations against them, noted the absence of a victim injury report, and concluded that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 2,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case