TAFAJUL @ TAFEJUL @ TAVAJUL HAQUE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 299/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010005992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

450/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

CHAKULIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,

Petitioner(s)

TAFAJUL @ TAFEJUL @ TAVAJUL HAQUE

Adv. PRATAP KAR

SANAULLAH @ MD SANAULLAH

HAYAT ALI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order

Summary The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Tafajul Haque, Sanaullah, and Hayat Ali) in a case involving charges under sections 85/115(2)/74/109/304/3(5) B.N.S. The court allowed the application based on the victim's simple nature injuries, witness statements, and the fact that the principal accused (husband) was already on bail. The petitioners were released on furnishing Rs. 3,000 bail bonds each with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Tafajul Haque, Sanaullah, and Hayat Ali) in a case involving charges under sections 85/115(2)/74/109/304/3(5) B.N.S. The court allowed the application based on the victim's simple nature injuries, witness statements, and the fact that the principal accused (husband) was already on bail. The petitioners were released on furnishing Rs. 3,000 bail bonds each with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case