TAFAJUL @ TAFEJUL @ TAVAJUL HAQUE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 299/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010005992026

Filing Number

450/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

CHAKULIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAFAJUL @ TAFEJUL @ TAVAJUL HAQUE

    Adv. PRATAP KAR

  2. 2.SANAULLAH @ MD SANAULLAH

  3. 3.HAYAT ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Tafajul Haque, Sanaullah, and Hayat Ali) in a case involving charges under sections 85/115(2)/74/109/304/3(5) B.N.S. The court allowed the application based on the victim's simple nature injuries, witness statements, and the fact that the principal accused (husband) was already on bail. The petitioners were released on furnishing Rs. 3,000 bail bonds each with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Tafajul Haque, Sanaullah, and Hayat Ali) in a case involving charges under sections 85/115(2)/74/109/304/3(5) B.N.S. The court allowed the application based on the victim's simple nature injuries, witness statements, and the fact that the principal accused (husband) was already on bail. The petitioners were released on furnishing Rs. 3,000 bail bonds each with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case