AJIJUR RAHAMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 298/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010005982026

Filing Number

449/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

298/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

RAIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIJUR RAHAMAN

    Adv. DIPAK DAS

  2. 2.ABDUL MANNAN MIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajijur Rahaman and Abdul Mannan Miah in a case involving allegations under sections 85/82(1)/89/64/109/351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. The court found no specific allegations against these two petitioners (accused nos. 3 & 4), with primary allegations directed at accused nos. 1 & 2. They were released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety of like amount, subject to compliance with section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ajijur Rahaman and Abdul Mannan Miah in a case involving allegations under sections 85/82(1)/89/64/109/351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. The court found no specific allegations against these two petitioners (accused nos. 3 & 4), with primary allegations directed at accused nos. 1 & 2. They were released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety of like amount, subject to compliance with section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case