MD IZHAR ALAM ALIAS JIHAR ASRAF vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 297/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--Allowed in part on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010005882026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
297/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed in part
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
CHAKULIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD IZHAR ALAM ALIAS JIHAR ASRAF
Adv. PRATAP KAR
TARIK ANWAR ALIAS MD TARIK ALAM
MAKSUD
MUJENA KHATUN ALIAS BIBI MARJINA ALIAS MAJUNA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Md Izhar Alam under Section 482 of B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of sexual intercourse through deception under Section 69 B.N.S. The court found prima facie evidence of deception and concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted at this stage, despite the petitioner's claim that the parties were in a consensual relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Md Izhar Alam under Section 482 of B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of sexual intercourse through deception under Section 69 B.N.S. The court found prima facie evidence of deception and concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted at this stage, despite the petitioner's claim that the parties were in a consensual relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts