GOYA PAUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010005602026

Filing Number

424/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOYA PAUL

    Adv. PRATAP KAR

  2. 2.AMAL SINGHA

  3. 3.CHIRANJIT PAUL

  4. 4.KAUSAL PAUL

  5. 5.BISHTU PAUL ALIAS BISTU PAUL ALIAS GOPAL PAUL

  6. 6.GOBIN ALIAS ADAM PAUL ALIAS GOBIN GANESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Goya Paul, Amal Singha, Chiranjit Paul, Kausal Paul, Bishtu Paul, and Gobin Paul) in connection with Goalpokher P.S. Case No.682/2025, finding no reason to refuse their prayer after examining case materials and the victim's statement. The accused were released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.3,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.1,500/- each, subject to conditions that they comply with B.N.S.S provisions and refrain from intimidating witnesses or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Goya Paul, Amal Singha, Chiranjit Paul, Kausal Paul, Bishtu Paul, and Gobin Paul) in connection with Goalpokher P.S. Case No.682/2025, finding no reason to refuse their prayer after examining case materials and the victim's statement. The accused were released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.3,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.1,500/- each, subject to conditions that they comply with B.N.S.S provisions and refrain from intimidating witnesses or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case