DANISH QURAISHI vs STATE OF BENGAL REPRESENTED BY ITS COLLECTOR — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: WBUD010005582026
Filing Number
422/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
4-ADJ Ftc I
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DANISH QURAISHI
Adv. KARIMUL KABIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BENGAL REPRESENTED BY ITS COLLECTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order and granted interim custody of 20 seized buffaloes to petitioner Danesh Qureshi, finding that ownership was undisputed and no material evidence suggested the owner should be treated as an accused. The court held that since the petitioner is not charged with any offense and the current custodian's status is questionable, interim custody should be returned to the legitimate owner upon execution of a ₹2 lakh Zimma Bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ Ftc I
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Order
ADJ Ftc I
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
ADJ Ftc I
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearence
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order and granted interim custody of 20 seized buffaloes to petitioner Danesh Qureshi, finding that ownership was undisputed and no material evidence suggested the owner should be treated as an accused. The court held that since the petitioner is not charged with any offense and the current custodian's status is questionable, interim custody should be returned to the legitimate owner upon execution of a ₹2 lakh Zimma Bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts