HARUN RASHID vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 272/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010005482026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
412/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
272/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
CHAKULIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARUN RASHID
Adv. BISWAJIT SINHA
ALI IMRAN RAMAZ
JAMAL ALI @ ABDUR RAHIM
SERAJUL HAQUE @ SERAJUL ISLAM
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Harun Rashid, Ali Imran Ramaz, Jamal Ali, and Seraju Haque) under Section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of mischief and related offenses. The court found the primary allegations were political in nature, lacked sufficient material to support a conspiracy charge under Section 109 B.N.S, and determined that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation had proceeded substantially and co-accused were already on bail. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 4,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Harun Rashid, Ali Imran Ramaz, Jamal Ali, and Seraju Haque) under Section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of mischief and related offenses. The court found the primary allegations were political in nature, lacked sufficient material to support a conspiracy charge under Section 109 B.N.S, and determined that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation had proceeded substantially and co-accused were already on bail. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 4,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts