HARUN RASHID vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 272/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010005482026
Filing Number
412/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
272/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
CHAKULIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARUN RASHID
Adv. BISWAJIT SINHA
-
2.ALI IMRAN RAMAZ
-
3.JAMAL ALI @ ABDUR RAHIM
-
4.SERAJUL HAQUE @ SERAJUL ISLAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Harun Rashid, Ali Imran Ramaz, Jamal Ali, and Seraju Haque) under Section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of mischief and related offenses. The court found the primary allegations were political in nature, lacked sufficient material to support a conspiracy charge under Section 109 B.N.S, and determined that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation had proceeded substantially and co-accused were already on bail. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 4,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Harun Rashid, Ali Imran Ramaz, Jamal Ali, and Seraju Haque) under Section 482 B.N.S.S in a case involving allegations of mischief and related offenses. The court found the primary allegations were political in nature, lacked sufficient material to support a conspiracy charge under Section 109 B.N.S, and determined that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation had proceeded substantially and co-accused were already on bail. Each petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 4,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts