STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs Krishna Kr. Mandal — 4/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules Section 21(b),29. Status: I.O.S report. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
N D P S Case - NDPS Case
CNR: WBUD010001852026
Filing Number
146/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
2-ADJ I
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
RAIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krishna Kr. Mandal
-
2.Roshan Kumar
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
I.O.S report
ADJ I
-
23-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: Bail granted to both accused persons Krishna Kr. Mandal and Roshan Kumar in NDPS Case No. 04 of 2026. Each accused is released on bail of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to cooperation with investigation and weekly meetings with the Investigating Officer. The court found that the statutory bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act did not apply as the seized quantity was below commercial quantity and investigation had sufficiently progressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
I.O.S report
ADJ I
-
19-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
05-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
22-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Summary: Bail granted to both accused persons Krishna Kr. Mandal and Roshan Kumar in NDPS Case No. 04 of 2026. Each accused is released on bail of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to cooperation with investigation and weekly meetings with the Investigating Officer. The court found that the statutory bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act did not apply as the seized quantity was below commercial quantity and investigation had sufficiently progressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts