aState of W.B. vs Supendra Nath Barman 5 others — 54/2014

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Criminal Case

CNR: WBUD010000772010

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2156/2014

Filing Date

13-04-2010

Registration No

54/2014

Registration Date

13-04-2010

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

2-ADJ I

FIR Details

FIR Number

06/2004

Police Station

HEMTABAD

Year

2004

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 409

Petitioner(s)

aState of W.B.

Respondent(s)

Supendra Nath Barman 5 others

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

10-03-2026

Evidence

16-01-2026

Evidence

23-09-2025

Evidence

25-07-2025

Evidence

19-06-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

27-04-2012

Order Number 1

16-09-2013

Order Number 2

20-12-2013

Order Number 3

03-09-2014

Order Number 4

16-07-2019
Order
17-07-2019
Order
18-07-2019
Order
19-07-2019
Order
05-03-2020
Order
24-05-2021
Order
20-09-2021
Order
21-02-2022
Order
22-02-2022
Order
23-02-2022
Order
31-08-2022
Order
02-12-2022
Order
01-08-2023
Order
02-08-2023
Order
15-12-2023
Order
05-07-2024
Order
06-07-2024
Order
18-11-2024
Order
27-03-2025
Order
05-05-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order
25-07-2025
Order
23-09-2025
Order
16-01-2026
Order

Summary: The case was adjourned to 10.03.2026 for appearance and evidence of the Investigating Officer. Three accused persons (Tarani Barman, Baidyanath Roy, Ratan Kumar Barman) appeared on court bail, while one accused (Arun Sarkar) was absent with petition u/s 317 Cr.P.C. The adjournment was granted at the Special Public Prosecutor's request due to absence of prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case was adjourned to 10.03.2026 for appearance and evidence of the Investigating Officer. Three accused persons (Tarani Barman, Baidyanath Roy, Ratan Kumar Barman) appeared on court bail, while one accused (Arun Sarkar) was absent with petition u/s 317 Cr.P.C. The adjournment was granted at the Special Public Prosecutor's request due to absence of prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case