Majeda Bibi vs Manjuara Bibi and 30 others — 196/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: WBSP170008942025

Filing Number

327/2025

Filing Date

01-Sep-2025

Registration No

196/2025

Registration Date

01-Sep-2025

Court

Additiona Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs

Judge

6-Acjm Cum Cjsd

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Majeda Bibi

    Adv. Pradip Nayek

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manjuara Bibi and 30 others

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Acjm Cum Cjsd

  3. 01-Sep-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

  4. 01-Sep-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: In Title Suit No. 196 of 2025 (partition suit), the court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, directing both parties to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed property until 26.09.2025. Additionally, the court allowed the plaintiff's application for local inspection of the property and appointed Advocate Lakshikanta Pati as Commissioner to conduct the inspection and submit a report; the plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 2,200 as inspection costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Title Suit No. 196 of 2025 (partition suit), the court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, directing both parties to maintain status quo regarding the nature, character, and possession of the disputed property until 26.09.2025. Additionally, the court allowed the plaintiff's application for local inspection of the property and appointed Advocate Lakshikanta Pati as Commissioner to conduct the inspection and submit a report; the plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 2,200 as inspection costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case