DOLI JANA vs MITALI JALANIAND 9 OTHERS — 145/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBSP170007272022
Filing Number
212/2022
Filing Date
30-Aug-2022
Registration No
145/2022
Registration Date
30-Aug-2022
Court
Additiona Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs
Judge
6-Acjm Cum Cjsd
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DOLI JANA
Adv. KAUSIK KAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MITALI JALANIAND 9 OTHERS
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
In case TS 167/22, the court adjourned the matter to 25.06.26 for the plaintiff to take further steps. Both the plaintiff's counsel and defendants' counsel (nos. 3-6) were present. The ACJM (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate) was in charge due to the P.O. being on SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Steps
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
11-Dec-2025
Order By CourtView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Steps
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
07-Aug-2025
Order By CourtView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Steps
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
05-Apr-2025
Order By CourtView PDF
-
05-Apr-2025
Steps
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
17-Dec-2024
Order By CourtView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Steps
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
12-Jul-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
14-May-2024
Order By CourtView PDF
-
14-May-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
19-Feb-2024
Order By CourtView PDF
-
19-Feb-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
16-Oct-2023
Order By CourtView PDF
-
16-Oct-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
14-Jul-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
19-Apr-2023
Order By CourtView PDF
-
19-Apr-2023
Order By CourtView PDF
-
19-Apr-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
07-Mar-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
08-Feb-2023
Order By CourtView PDF
-
08-Feb-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
04-Nov-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Acjm Cum Cjsd
-
30-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 145/2022
In case TS 167/22, the court adjourned the matter to 25.06.26 for the plaintiff to take further steps. Both the plaintiff's counsel and defendants' counsel (nos. 3-6) were present. The ACJM (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate) was in charge due to the P.O. being on SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts