STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs RABINDRANATH BERA — 420/2011
Case under The Industrial Disputes (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 19861986 Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 18th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBSP170007162011
Filing Number
420/2011
Filing Date
09-May-2011
Registration No
420/2011
Registration Date
09-May-2011
Court
Additiona Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs
Judge
2-
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.RABINDRANATH BERA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
Summary The ACJM Kakdwip acquitted all four accused persons under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. in a 16-year-old case involving charges under IPC sections 448/354/323/34. The prosecution failed to produce and examine the sole victim/complainant despite multiple opportunities and attempts to locate her at provided addresses, rendering the case unmaintainable and forcing closure of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Order
-
11-Mar-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
-
29-Dec-2025
Order By CourtView PDF
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Aug-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2020
Evidence
-
08-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
23-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
22-Mar-2019
Evidence
-
26-Sep-2018
Evidence
-
02-May-2018
Evidence
-
05-Jan-2018
Evidence
-
02-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 420/2011
Summary The ACJM Kakdwip acquitted all four accused persons under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. in a 16-year-old case involving charges under IPC sections 448/354/323/34. The prosecution failed to produce and examine the sole victim/complainant despite multiple opportunities and attempts to locate her at provided addresses, rendering the case unmaintainable and forcing closure of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts