MAMATA SHIT vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 131/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Status: Hearing of Petition. Next hearing: 05th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Hearing of Petition Next hearing 05-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBSP150012232024

Filing Number

613/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

131/2024

Registration Date

17-Dec-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs

Judge

2-

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMATA SHIT

    Adv. DEBANJAN SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

  2. 2.SUIMITRA SHIT

Case History

  1. 05-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ 1

  3. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ 1

  4. 08-May-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Revision 131 of 2024 before the A.S.J. 2nd Court, Kakdwip (South 24 Parganas), the case has been adjourned to 31.07.25 for hearing on a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Both the revisionist and respondent are present, with the respondent represented through vakalatnama. Any Writ of Prohibition, if applicable, is pending in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-May-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ 1

  6. 17-Mar-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2025

    Steps

    ADJ 2

  8. 11-Feb-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

  9. 11-Feb-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  10. 24-Dec-2024

    Order By CourtView PDF

  11. 24-Dec-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  12. 20-Dec-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  13. 17-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Revision 131 of 2024 before the A.S.J. 2nd Court, Kakdwip (South 24 Parganas), the case has been adjourned to 31.07.25 for hearing on a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Both the revisionist and respondent are present, with the respondent represented through vakalatnama. Any Writ of Prohibition, if applicable, is pending in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case