RANJAN MAITY vs UPAMA JANA (MAITY) — 404/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B). Status: Reconciliation. Next hearing: 05th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Reconciliation Next hearing 05-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Matrimonial Suit.

CNR: WBSP150009282024

Filing Number

483/2024

Filing Date

30-Aug-2024

Registration No

404/2024

Registration Date

30-Aug-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs

Judge

2-

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN MAITY

    Adv. SUKESH DALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UPAMA JANA (MAITY)

Case History

  1. 05-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Nov-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ 1

  3. 11-Sep-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ 1

  4. 01-Sep-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ 1

  5. 02-Jun-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

    MAT SUIT 404 OF 2024: Case adjourned to 01.09.25 for further reconciliation. No steps were taken by either party; the court noted it was lying vacant and the Presiding Officer was busy with other files. CRL REV 21 OF 2025: Case adjourned to 13.06.25 for appearance and hearing of stay petition. The revisionist filed hazira (appearance); the court was vacant and the Presiding Officer was occupied with other matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 02-Jun-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ 1

  7. 17-Mar-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

  8. 17-Mar-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ 2

  9. 30-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 404/2024

casestatus.in Summary

MAT SUIT 404 OF 2024: Case adjourned to 01.09.25 for further reconciliation. No steps were taken by either party; the court noted it was lying vacant and the Presiding Officer was busy with other files. CRL REV 21 OF 2025: Case adjourned to 13.06.25 for appearance and hearing of stay petition. The revisionist filed hazira (appearance); the court was vacant and the Presiding Officer was occupied with other matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case