RAKESH DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 61/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 05th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 05-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBSP150006242024

Filing Number

307/2024

Filing Date

26-Jun-2024

Registration No

61/2024

Registration Date

26-Jun-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Kakdwip, South 24 Pgs

Judge

2-

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH DAS

    Adv. RADHAKRISHNA MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

  2. 2.ARPITA PRAMANIK (DAS)

Case History

  1. 05-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Nov-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  3. 31-Jul-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  4. 14-May-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: Criminal Revision petition CRL REV 61 of 2024 was adjourned to 31.07.2025 for S/R (submission of reply), D (decision), P/R (petitioner's rejoinder), and TCR (transfer case record). The court extended the existing ad interim order until the next date of hearing due to the court lying vacant and the presiding officer being unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 14-May-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  6. 20-Feb-2025

    Order By CourtView PDF

  7. 20-Feb-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 2

  8. 20-Nov-2024

    Order By CourtView PDF

  9. 20-Nov-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 2

  10. 09-Sep-2024

    Order By CourtView PDF

  11. 09-Sep-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ 1

  12. 30-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  13. 26-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 26-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Criminal Revision petition CRL REV 61 of 2024 was adjourned to 31.07.2025 for S/R (submission of reply), D (decision), P/R (petitioner's rejoinder), and TCR (transfer case record). The court extended the existing ad interim order until the next date of hearing due to the court lying vacant and the presiding officer being unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case