SIMA PURKAIT vs ARABINDA PURKAIT — 547/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Argument / Further Argument. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance
CNR: WBSP140033752019
Filing Number
3372/2019
Filing Date
11-Dec-2019
Registration No
547/2019
Registration Date
11-Dec-2019
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour Criminal, South 24 Pgs.
Judge
3-Jm II
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIMA PURKAIT
Adv. BIDHAN CHANDRA MONDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARABINDA PURKAIT
Case History
-
16-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Jm II
-
11-Mar-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Jm II
-
04-Feb-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Jm II
-
23-Dec-2025
Argument / Further Argument
Jm II
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence of Defence Witness
Jm II
-
14-May-2025
Evidence of Defence Witness
Jm II
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence of Defence Witness
Jm II
-
13-Jun-2024
Order by MagistrateView PDF
Summary: The case before the Judicial Magistrate (2nd Court), Diamond Harbour was adjourned on 13/06/2024 as neither the parties nor their conducting advocate appeared for hearing. The court passed no adverse order due to a resolution adopted by the Local Bar associations, and directed the bench clerk to fix a further date of proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence
Jm II
-
20-Jan-2024
Order by MagistrateView PDF
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jm II
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jm II
-
23-Mar-2023
Order by MagistrateView PDF
-
23-Mar-2023
Evidence
Jm II
-
31-Jan-2023
Order by MagistrateView PDF
-
31-Jan-2023
Hearing of Petition
Jm II
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
27-Jun-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
24-Mar-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
21-Nov-2020
Hearing
Jm II
-
11-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 547/2019
Summary: The case before the Judicial Magistrate (2nd Court), Diamond Harbour was adjourned on 13/06/2024 as neither the parties nor their conducting advocate appeared for hearing. The court passed no adverse order due to a resolution adopted by the Local Bar associations, and directed the bench clerk to fix a further date of proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts