STATE vs SWAPAN BAIDYA — 501/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279338. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 10th March 2027.

Charge / Plea Hearing Next hearing 10-Mar-2027

Gr Case

CNR: WBSP140025492013

Filing Number

674/2016

Filing Date

22-Jul-2013

Registration No

501/2016

Registration Date

22-Jul-2013

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour Criminal, South 24 Pgs.

Judge

3-Jm II

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SWAPAN BAIDYA

Case History

  1. 10-Mar-2027

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm II

  3. 14-Mar-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm II

  4. 04-May-2024

    Order by MagistrateView PDF

    Case Adjourned The case before the 2nd Judicial Magistrate Court, Diamond Harbour was adjourned on 04/05/2024 as neither the parties nor their advocates appeared for hearing. No adverse order was passed due to a resolution adopted by local bar association members, and the bench clerk was directed to fix a further date for proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 04-May-2024

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Jm II

  6. 19-Aug-2023

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Jm II

  7. 26-Jul-2022

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Jm II

  8. 02-Feb-2022

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Jm II

  9. 27-Jul-2020

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Jm II

  10. 11-Dec-2019

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Jm II

  11. 20-Mar-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  12. 07-Jul-2018

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  13. 09-Nov-2017

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  14. 02-Feb-2017

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  15. 23-Dec-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 22-Jul-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 501/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned The case before the 2nd Judicial Magistrate Court, Diamond Harbour was adjourned on 04/05/2024 as neither the parties nor their advocates appeared for hearing. No adverse order was passed due to a resolution adopted by local bar association members, and the bench clerk was directed to fix a further date for proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case