JANEHARA BIBI (KHA) vs MAJID ALI KHA — 244/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBSP140009182024

Filing Number

891/2024

Filing Date

04-Jul-2024

Registration No

244/2024

Registration Date

04-Jul-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour Criminal, South 24 Pgs.

Judge

3-Jm II

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANEHARA BIBI (KHA)

    Adv. RUDRA NARAYAN HALDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAJID ALI KHA

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jm II

  3. 17-Oct-2025

    Order by MagistrateView PDF

    Summary: The interim maintenance petition filed by Janehara Bibi (Kha) against Majid Ali Kha under Section 144 of BNSS has been rejected. The court found insufficient prima facie case and urgency for granting interim maintenance of Rs. 30,000/month (Rs. 20,000 for the petitioner and Rs. 10,000 for the minor son), citing lack of documentary evidence and conflicting claims regarding voluntary departure from the matrimonial home. The case is adjourned to 07-03-2026 for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jm II

  5. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    Jm II

  6. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    Jm II

  7. 05-Jun-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    Jm II

  8. 29-Mar-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    Jm II

  9. 28-Nov-2024

    Written Objection

    Jm II

  10. 24-Oct-2024

    Order

    Jm II

  11. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 04-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 244/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The interim maintenance petition filed by Janehara Bibi (Kha) against Majid Ali Kha under Section 144 of BNSS has been rejected. The court found insufficient prima facie case and urgency for granting interim maintenance of Rs. 30,000/month (Rs. 20,000 for the petitioner and Rs. 10,000 for the minor son), citing lack of documentary evidence and conflicting claims regarding voluntary departure from the matrimonial home. The case is adjourned to 07-03-2026 for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case