MITHU MONDAL vs SUJIT MONDAL — 158/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBSP140007822022

Filing Number

775/2022

Filing Date

27-Apr-2022

Registration No

158/2022

Registration Date

27-Apr-2022

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour Criminal, South 24 Pgs.

Judge

4-Jm III

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHU MONDAL

    Adv. SAMIR KUMAR DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUJIT MONDAL

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jm III

  3. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jm III

  4. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jm III

  5. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jm III

  6. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jm III

  7. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Jm III

  8. 12-Jun-2023

    Order by MagistrateView PDF

    Case Summary: The court partially granted interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The husband is directed to pay Rs. 2,500 per month to the wife and Rs. 1,000 per month for the minor child (total Rs. 3,500/month) during case pendency. However, maintenance for the wife alone was denied due to allegations of desertion against her, pending cogent evidence at trial. The case is adjourned to 08.08.23 for recording evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Jm III

  10. 05-May-2023

    Order

    Jm III

  11. 24-Aug-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm III

  12. 27-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 27-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court partially granted interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The husband is directed to pay Rs. 2,500 per month to the wife and Rs. 1,000 per month for the minor child (total Rs. 3,500/month) during case pendency. However, maintenance for the wife alone was denied due to allegations of desertion against her, pending cogent evidence at trial. The case is adjourned to 08.08.23 for recording evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case