SHIBANI MONDAL vs DUD KUMAR MONDAL — 28/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBSP140001072025

Filing Number

107/2025

Filing Date

20-Jan-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

20-Jan-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour Criminal, South 24 Pgs.

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIBANI MONDAL

    Adv. GOUR HARI SARDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DUD KUMAR MONDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  3. 03-Jan-2026

    Show Cause

    Acjm

  4. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 12-Jun-2025

    Order by MagistrateView PDF

    The court allowed Shibani Mondal's interim maintenance application, ordering her husband Dud Kumar Mondal to pay ₹2,000/month to the wife and ₹1,500/month each for two minor sons (Suman and Akshay), rejecting his claim that she voluntarily left. The court found the legally married wife entitled to maintenance pending trial, noting the husband is fit and able-bodied, though no maintenance was awarded for the third son residing with the husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 28-Apr-2025

    Written Objection

    Acjm

  10. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Shibani Mondal's interim maintenance application, ordering her husband Dud Kumar Mondal to pay ₹2,000/month to the wife and ₹1,500/month each for two minor sons (Suman and Akshay), rejecting his claim that she voluntarily left. The court found the legally married wife entitled to maintenance pending trial, noting the husband is fit and able-bodied, though no maintenance was awarded for the third son residing with the husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case