STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs AJGAR LASKAR AND OTHERS — 170/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302/201/34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBSP100014102022
Filing Number
880/2022
Filing Date
31-May-2022
Registration No
170/2022
Registration Date
31-May-2022
Court
Additional District Judge,Diamond Harbour Civil, South 24 Pgs.
Judge
4-Ftc III
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. Mr. Bivas Chatterjee
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJGAR LASKAR AND OTHERS
-
2.RABIUL SARDER @ BABULAL
-
3.AJAHAR @ AJAHARUDDIN LASKAR @ RAJA
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Ftc III
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Ftc III
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
02-Dec-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
Summary of Court Orders Order 1 (ST 11 (08) 2022, dated 02.12.2024): Bail petition DENIED for three accused in a murder case (IPC §302/201/34). The court rejected bail despite the accused being in custody for an extended period, as 17 prosecution witnesses had already been examined with more to follow, and prior bail applications had also been rejected. Order 2 (CMC 447/2024, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Babusona Sardar in a dacoity case (IPC §399/402) for Rs. 3,000 with sureties, as investigation showed no major progress and no custodial interrogation was required. Order 3 (CMC 449/2024, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Abdul Halim Halder in a dacoity case (IPC §399/402) for Rs. 3,000 with sureties, as charge sheet was already filed and prosecution raised no formal objection. Order 4 (SC 108/2022, dated 24.06.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Susanta Halder in a sexual assault case (IPC §376/511) for Rs. 4,000 with sureties, considering his month-long detention sufficient punishment for violating prior bail conditions. Order 5 (SC 3(5)23, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Masum Fakir and Manowar Hossain Molla in a murder/attempted murder case (IPC §302/307/125B) for Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, as 11 prosecution witnesses provided no incriminating evidence against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
-
27-Nov-2024
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
18-May-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
04-May-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
04-May-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
02-May-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
02-May-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
15-Mar-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
05-Mar-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
31-Jan-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
Ftc III
-
16-Dec-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
06-Oct-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
28-Aug-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
24-Jul-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
24-Jul-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
01-Jul-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
01-Jul-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
08-May-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
08-May-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
31-Mar-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
31-Mar-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
28-Mar-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
28-Mar-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
13-Feb-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
02-Feb-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
02-Feb-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
01-Feb-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
01-Feb-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
02-Jan-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
02-Jan-2023
Evidence
Ftc III
-
13-Dec-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
13-Dec-2022
Evidence
Ftc III
-
07-Dec-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
07-Dec-2022
Evidence
Ftc III
-
07-Nov-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
07-Nov-2022
Evidence
Ftc III
-
20-Sep-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
Ftc III
-
29-Aug-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
29-Aug-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
Ftc III
-
01-Aug-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
01-Aug-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
Ftc III
-
22-Jul-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
22-Jul-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
Ftc III
-
13-Jul-2022
Order by CourtView PDF
-
13-Jul-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
Ftc III
-
30-Jun-2022
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Ftc III
-
15-Jun-2022
Production
Ftc III
-
31-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 170/2022
Summary of Court Orders Order 1 (ST 11 (08) 2022, dated 02.12.2024): Bail petition DENIED for three accused in a murder case (IPC §302/201/34). The court rejected bail despite the accused being in custody for an extended period, as 17 prosecution witnesses had already been examined with more to follow, and prior bail applications had also been rejected. Order 2 (CMC 447/2024, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Babusona Sardar in a dacoity case (IPC §399/402) for Rs. 3,000 with sureties, as investigation showed no major progress and no custodial interrogation was required. Order 3 (CMC 449/2024, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Abdul Halim Halder in a dacoity case (IPC §399/402) for Rs. 3,000 with sureties, as charge sheet was already filed and prosecution raised no formal objection. Order 4 (SC 108/2022, dated 24.06.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Susanta Halder in a sexual assault case (IPC §376/511) for Rs. 4,000 with sureties, considering his month-long detention sufficient punishment for violating prior bail conditions. Order 5 (SC 3(5)23, dated 15.07.2024): Interim bail GRANTED to accused Masum Fakir and Manowar Hossain Molla in a murder/attempted murder case (IPC §302/307/125B) for Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, as 11 prosecution witnesses provided no incriminating evidence against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts