PROSENJIT BARIK vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 126/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
Criminal Misc case - Criminal Misc case
CNR: WBSP100004962026
Filing Number
277/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Additional District Judge,Diamond Harbour Civil, South 24 Pgs.
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
FALTA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PROSENJIT BARIK
Adv. SAMIM REJWAN JOMADER
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge granted interim bail to Prosenjit Barik in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 (§310(4)/310(5)) and the Arms Act, finding further detention unnecessary since no custodial interrogation was requested by the investigating officer despite his custody since 03.03.2026. The court set bail at Rs.3,000 with two sureties of Rs.1,500 each, subject to conditions including weekly meetings with the IO, court attendance, and non-tampering with evidence, valid until 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
16-Mar-2026
Order by CourtView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge granted interim bail to Prosenjit Barik in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 (§310(4)/310(5)) and the Arms Act, finding further detention unnecessary since no custodial interrogation was requested by the investigating officer despite his custody since 03.03.2026. The court set bail at Rs.3,000 with two sureties of Rs.1,500 each, subject to conditions including weekly meetings with the IO, court attendance, and non-tampering with evidence, valid until 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts