BALMIKI GHARAMI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 92/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc case - Criminal Misc case

CNR: WBSP100003932026

Filing Number

227/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge,Diamond Harbour Civil, South 24 Pgs.

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

454

Police Station

MANDIRBAZAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),74,115(2),117(2),109,351(2),118(1),3(5)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALMIKI GHARAMI

    Adv. Aloke Kumar Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

    The Special Court under the POCSO Act granted anticipatory bail to accused Balmiki Gharami, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 2,000 with one surety and directed to appear before the Trial Court within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    ADJ

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    ADJ

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Order by CourtView PDF

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    ADJ

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Court under the POCSO Act granted anticipatory bail to accused Balmiki Gharami, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary since investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 2,000 with one surety and directed to appear before the Trial Court within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case