NIKHIL PURKAIT vs SADHANA MONDAL AND ANOTHER — 4/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Lcr. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
Title Appeal
CNR: WBSP100001732019
Filing Number
80/2019
Filing Date
24-Jan-2019
Registration No
4/2019
Registration Date
24-Jan-2019
Court
Additional District Judge,Diamond Harbour Civil, South 24 Pgs.
Judge
4-Ftc III
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIKHIL PURKAIT
Adv. Dibyendu Panda
Respondent(s)
-
1.SADHANA MONDAL AND ANOTHER
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Lcr
Ftc III
-
01-Nov-2025
Lcr
Ftc III
-
06-Jun-2025
Lcr
Ftc III
-
15-Jan-2025
Lcr
-
14-Nov-2024
Lcr
-
16-Jul-2024
Lcr
-
07-Jun-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
Case TA-04/2019 (Nikhil Purkait v. Sadhana Mondal) was adjourned on 07.06.2024 to 16.07.2024 for service of respondent (SR). The appellant was directed to file fresh requisites for respondent no.-1 as no steps were taken and no SR was received. The regular P.O. was transferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jun-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
-
01-Mar-2024
Order by CourtView PDF
-
01-Mar-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Ftc III
-
24-Nov-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
24-Nov-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Ftc III
-
05-Aug-2023
Order by CourtView PDF
-
05-Aug-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Ftc III
-
26-Apr-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Ftc III
-
02-Feb-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Ftc III
-
09-Dec-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
27-Jul-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
21-Mar-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
23-Sep-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
23-Jun-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
22-Mar-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
29-May-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
16-Jan-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
26-Sep-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
02-Jul-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
06-Apr-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
18-Feb-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ
-
24-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2019
Case TA-04/2019 (Nikhil Purkait v. Sadhana Mondal) was adjourned on 07.06.2024 to 16.07.2024 for service of respondent (SR). The appellant was directed to file fresh requisites for respondent no.-1 as no steps were taken and no SR was received. The regular P.O. was transferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts