SRI OMPRAKASH JAISWAL vs SRI AUDHESH PRASAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER — 5/2025

Case under Advocates Act Section 123. Status: Hearing of Petition. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: WBSP070033472025

Hearing of Petition

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

3231/2025

Filing Date

09-12-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-SCC

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 123

Petitioner(s)

SRI OMPRAKASH JAISWAL

Adv. RANJIT KUMAR DE

Respondent(s)

SRI AUDHESH PRASAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: 7-SCC

06-03-2026

Hearing of Petition

28-01-2026

Hearing of Petition

13-01-2026

Hearing of Petition

06-01-2026

Order

12-12-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

13-01-2026
order

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's petition under Order 18 Rule 16 CPC filed on 13/06/2025, which sought to call witness Raj Bali Shaw to testify immediately regarding a disputed family settlement agreement (Panchnama). The court held that the plaintiff was attempting to bypass standard evidentiary procedure by calling the attesting witness before the document itself was formally proved by the legal custodian, and that the witness's age and infirmity did not justify departing from established rules of evidence. The ad interim injunction was extended till the next date, with the injunction application hearing fixed for 28/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's petition under Order 18 Rule 16 CPC filed on 13/06/2025, which sought to call witness Raj Bali Shaw to testify immediately regarding a disputed family settlement agreement (Panchnama). The court held that the plaintiff was attempting to bypass standard evidentiary procedure by calling the attesting witness before the document itself was formally proved by the legal custodian, and that the witness's age and infirmity did not justify departing from established rules of evidence. The ad interim injunction was extended till the next date, with the injunction application hearing fixed for 28/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case