SRI OMPRAKASH JAISWAL vs SRI AUDHESH PRASAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER — 5/2025
Case under Advocates Act Section 123. Status: Hearing of Petition. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBSP070033472025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
3231/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas
Judge
7-SCC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI OMPRAKASH JAISWAL
Adv. RANJIT KUMAR DE
Respondent(s)
SRI AUDHESH PRASAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER
Hearing History
Judge: 7-SCC
Hearing of Petition
Hearing of Petition
Hearing of Petition
Order
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing of Petition |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing of Petition |
| 13-01-2026 | Hearing of Petition |
| 06-01-2026 | Order |
| 12-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's petition under Order 18 Rule 16 CPC filed on 13/06/2025, which sought to call witness Raj Bali Shaw to testify immediately regarding a disputed family settlement agreement (Panchnama). The court held that the plaintiff was attempting to bypass standard evidentiary procedure by calling the attesting witness before the document itself was formally proved by the legal custodian, and that the witness's age and infirmity did not justify departing from established rules of evidence. The ad interim injunction was extended till the next date, with the injunction application hearing fixed for 28/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's petition under Order 18 Rule 16 CPC filed on 13/06/2025, which sought to call witness Raj Bali Shaw to testify immediately regarding a disputed family settlement agreement (Panchnama). The court held that the plaintiff was attempting to bypass standard evidentiary procedure by calling the attesting witness before the document itself was formally proved by the legal custodian, and that the witness's age and infirmity did not justify departing from established rules of evidence. The ad interim injunction was extended till the next date, with the injunction application hearing fixed for 28/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts