ASHOK GUPTA vs MAHABIR UPADHYA — 1045/2018
Case under Advocates Act Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th May 2026.
Scc Execution
CNR: WBSP070033032018
Filing Number
3169/2018
Filing Date
06-Sep-2018
Registration No
1045/2018
Registration Date
06-Sep-2018
Court
Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas
Judge
7-Scc
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK GUPTA
Adv. INDRANI GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHABIR UPADHYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
orderView PDF
-
18-May-2026
orderView PDF
The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (1045/2018) between Ashok Gupta and Mahabir Upadhya for default on 18/05/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) took no steps despite sufficient opportunities to file a show cause and that further adjournments would serve no purpose, as the case had been pending long without progress. The court directed the D.A. to recall any writ if issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Disposed
Scc
-
16-Apr-2026
Show Cause
Scc
-
13-Mar-2026
payment
Scc
-
01-Apr-2025
payment
Scc
-
15-May-2024
orderView PDF
-
15-May-2024
payment
Scc
-
10-Apr-2023
payment
Scc
-
15-Feb-2023
payment
Scc
-
06-Jan-2022
payment
Scc
-
01-Feb-2021
payment
Scc
-
19-Nov-2020
payment
Scc
-
31-Jan-2020
payment
Scc
-
10-Apr-2019
payment
Scc
-
17-Jan-2019
Further Order
Scc
-
11-Jan-2019
Verification
Scc
-
08-Jan-2019
Verification
Scc
-
06-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 1045/2018
The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (1045/2018) between Ashok Gupta and Mahabir Upadhya for default on 18/05/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) took no steps despite sufficient opportunities to file a show cause and that further adjournments would serve no purpose, as the case had been pending long without progress. The court directed the D.A. to recall any writ if issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts