SMT. TIYASA BASU ROY vs SRI VIKRAMJIT CHATTERJEE — 383/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED ON MUTUAL CONSENT on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

Mat Suit

CNR: WBSP070028012025

Filing Number

2715/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

383/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ-I

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED ON MUTUAL CONSENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. TIYASA BASU ROY

    Adv. TAWNE ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI VIKRAMJIT CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case 383/2025 Summary: The Additional District Judge granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by Tiyasa Basu Roy and Vikramjit Chatterjee under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the parties had lived separately since August 2024 (exceeding one year), had no prospect of reconciliation, and mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage without collusion. The marital tie was dissolved effective May 6, 2026, with no children involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Reconciliation

    ADJ-I

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    orderView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 383/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 383/2025 Summary: The Additional District Judge granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by Tiyasa Basu Roy and Vikramjit Chatterjee under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the parties had lived separately since August 2024 (exceeding one year), had no prospect of reconciliation, and mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage without collusion. The marital tie was dissolved effective May 6, 2026, with no children involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case