ANAND RAM TANDON vs KHAGO DAS — 931/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Execution

CNR: WBSP070025562021

Filing Number

2595/2021

Filing Date

30-Nov-2021

Registration No

931/2021

Registration Date

30-Nov-2021

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND RAM TANDON

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH , F485/421/2000

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHAGO DAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    orderView PDF

    The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (931/2021) for default on 15/05/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) had taken no steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause response, and further adjournments would be futile. Given the prolonged pendency without progress, the court disposed of and dismissed the case for default, directing the Dealing Assistant to recall any issued writ. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    payment

    Scc

  6. 31-Mar-2025

    payment

    Scc

  7. 15-May-2024

    orderView PDF

  8. 15-May-2024

    payment

    Scc

  9. 02-Aug-2023

    orderView PDF

  10. 02-Aug-2023

    payment

    Scc

  11. 24-Jun-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  12. 05-Apr-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  13. 04-Apr-2022

    Verification

    Scc

  14. 08-Mar-2022

    Verification

    Scc

  15. 30-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 30-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 931/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (931/2021) for default on 15/05/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) had taken no steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause response, and further adjournments would be futile. Given the prolonged pendency without progress, the court disposed of and dismissed the case for default, directing the Dealing Assistant to recall any issued writ. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case