DIPAK KUMAR THAKUR vs SUBRATA JANA — 741/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070020712024

Filing Number

2000/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

741/2024

Registration Date

27-Jun-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPAK KUMAR THAKUR

    Adv. RITA SAMANTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBRATA JANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary The Sealdah Small Causes Court dismissed S.C.C Suit 741 of 2024 for default on 22/04/2026. The plaintiff failed to appear on the scheduled date for filing a show cause and took no steps to proceed, while the defendant's advocate was present. The judge found the plaintiff unwilling to continue the case and dismissed the suit accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Written Statement.

    Scc

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Scc

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Restored

    Scc

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Scc

  10. 22-Jul-2024

    orderView PDF

  11. 22-Jul-2024

    Disposed

    Scc

  12. 18-Jul-2024

    orderView PDF

  13. 18-Jul-2024

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  14. 27-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 741/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sealdah Small Causes Court dismissed S.C.C Suit 741 of 2024 for default on 22/04/2026. The plaintiff failed to appear on the scheduled date for filing a show cause and took no steps to proceed, while the defendant's advocate was present. The judge found the plaintiff unwilling to continue the case and dismissed the suit accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case