SUNIL KR. MAHATO vs APAL DAS GUPTA — 535/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Execution

CNR: WBSP070018382022

Filing Number

1819/2022

Filing Date

07-Jul-2022

Registration No

535/2022

Registration Date

07-Jul-2022

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KR. MAHATO

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APAL DAS GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary: The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed an execution case for default on 16/04/2026 because the defendant (Dhr) took no steps despite being given sufficient opportunities to file a show cause reply and the case remained pending without progress for an extended period. The court ordered the relevant registers be noted and directed the Dealing Assistant to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  6. 19-Feb-2025

    payment

    Scc

  7. 08-Apr-2024

    payment

    Scc

  8. 22-Nov-2023

    payment

    Scc

  9. 13-Sep-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  10. 27-Jul-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  11. 07-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 07-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 535/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed an execution case for default on 16/04/2026 because the defendant (Dhr) took no steps despite being given sufficient opportunities to file a show cause reply and the case remained pending without progress for an extended period. The court ordered the relevant registers be noted and directed the Dealing Assistant to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case