JAGAN NATH PRASAD SINGH vs ASRAF ALI — 81/2015
Case under All India Council for Technical Education Act Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 17th April 2026.
Scc Ex.
CNR: WBSP070015442015
Filing Number
1603/2015
Filing Date
14-May-2015
Registration No
81/2015
Registration Date
14-May-2015
Court
Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas
Judge
7-Scc
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGAN NATH PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASRAF ALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
orderView PDF
The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (81/2015) for default on 17/04/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) had taken no steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause, and further adjournments would serve no purpose given the case's prolonged pendency without progress. The court directed the Drawing and Disbursing Agent to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Scc
-
13-Mar-2026
payment
Scc
-
01-Apr-2025
payment
Scc
-
15-May-2024
orderView PDF
-
15-May-2024
payment
Scc
-
10-Apr-2023
payment
Scc
-
03-Mar-2022
payment
Scc
-
20-Mar-2021
payment
Scc
-
21-Mar-2020
payment
Scc
-
25-Feb-2020
payment
Scc
-
03-May-2019
payment
Scc
-
31-Jul-2018
payment
Scc
-
05-Dec-2017
payment
Scc
-
09-Mar-2017
payment
Scc
-
16-Jul-2016
payment
Scc
-
07-Jun-2016
Show Cause
Scc
-
07-May-2016
payment
Scc
-
01-Oct-2015
payment
Scc
-
18-Jun-2015
Further Order
Scc
-
14-May-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2015
Verification
-
14-May-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 81/2015
The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (81/2015) for default on 17/04/2026. The court found that the defendant (Dhr) had taken no steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause, and further adjournments would serve no purpose given the case's prolonged pendency without progress. The court directed the Drawing and Disbursing Agent to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts