AKASH KUMAR DAS vs SALINI GUPTA — 184/2025

Case under Advocates Act Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED ON MUTUAL CONSENT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Mat Suit

CNR: WBSP070015012025

Filing Number

1442/2025

Filing Date

15-May-2025

Registration No

184/2025

Registration Date

15-May-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

3-ADJ Ftc II

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED ON MUTUAL CONSENT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH KUMAR DAS

    Adv. PARVIN KHATUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SALINI GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage between Akash Kumar Das and Salini Gupta under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties' marriage registered on 14.12.2021 was dissolved as they had been living separately since that date, filed the suit after the mandatory one-year separation period, and provided evidence of genuine mutual consent without collusion, fraud, or undue influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc II

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    orderView PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    orderView PDF

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  10. 15-May-2025

    orderView PDF

  11. 15-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage between Akash Kumar Das and Salini Gupta under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties' marriage registered on 14.12.2021 was dissolved as they had been living separately since that date, filed the suit after the mandatory one-year separation period, and provided evidence of genuine mutual consent without collusion, fraud, or undue influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case