ANAND RAM TANDON vs AJAY HAZRA — 314/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Execution

CNR: WBSP070011692021

Filing Number

1173/2021

Filing Date

13-Apr-2021

Registration No

314/2021

Registration Date

13-Apr-2021

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND RAM TANDON

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH , F 485/421 OF 2000

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY HAZRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (314/2021) between Anand Ram Tandon and Ajay Hazra for default on 17/04/2026. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities to file a show cause response, the defendant (Dhr) took no steps, and the case had remained pending without progress for an extended period. Consequently, the court disposed of the execution case and directed the Dealing Assistant to recall any writ that may have been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  6. 21-Feb-2025

    payment

    Scc

  7. 10-Apr-2024

    orderView PDF

  8. 10-Apr-2024

    payment

    Scc

  9. 22-Nov-2023

    payment

    Scc

  10. 13-Sep-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  11. 25-Nov-2021

    Verification

    Scc

  12. 16-Sep-2021

    Verification

    Scc

  13. 13-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 13-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case (314/2021) between Anand Ram Tandon and Ajay Hazra for default on 17/04/2026. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities to file a show cause response, the defendant (Dhr) took no steps, and the case had remained pending without progress for an extended period. Consequently, the court disposed of the execution case and directed the Dealing Assistant to recall any writ that may have been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case