ANAND RAM TANDON vs JITENDRA HARI — 313/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Execution

CNR: WBSP070011682021

Filing Number

1172/2021

Filing Date

13-Apr-2021

Registration No

313/2021

Registration Date

13-Apr-2021

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND RAM TANDON

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH , F 485/421 OF 2000

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA HARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary of Case 313/2021 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Jitendra Hari): The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case for default on 17/04/2026. The defendant (Dhr) failed to take any steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause response, and further adjournments were deemed futile. Given the case's long pendency without progress, the court dismissed it for default and directed the Drawing & Disbursing Officer to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    Scc

  6. 21-Feb-2025

    payment

    Scc

  7. 10-Apr-2024

    orderView PDF

  8. 10-Apr-2024

    payment

    Scc

  9. 22-Nov-2023

    payment

    Scc

  10. 13-Sep-2022

    Further Order

    Scc

  11. 25-Nov-2021

    Verification

    Scc

  12. 16-Sep-2021

    Verification

    Scc

  13. 13-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 13-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 313/2021 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Jitendra Hari): The Small Cause Court, Sealdah dismissed the execution case for default on 17/04/2026. The defendant (Dhr) failed to take any steps despite multiple opportunities to file a show cause response, and further adjournments were deemed futile. Given the case's long pendency without progress, the court dismissed it for default and directed the Drawing & Disbursing Officer to recall any writ issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case