West Bengal vs Niloy Samaddar — 19/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
Special Court Cases
CNR: WBSP070008402025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
11-03-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas
Judge
1-ADJ-I
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
West Bengal
Respondent(s)
Niloy Samaddar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ-I
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 27-02-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 19/2025 - State of West Bengal v. Niloy Samaddar Court Decision: Niloy Samaddar was acquitted of charges under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 137(2) BNS (kidnapping of a minor). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the victim's minor status at the time of the alleged offense was confirmed, the victim herself did not testify that she was kidnapped or sexually assaulted; the parents did not corroborate these allegations; and the medical examination report contained no evidence of penetrative sexual assault. The court concluded the prosecution's case "miserably failed" to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: Case 19/2025 - State of West Bengal v. Niloy Samaddar Court Decision: Niloy Samaddar was acquitted of charges under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 137(2) BNS (kidnapping of a minor). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the victim's minor status at the time of the alleged offense was confirmed, the victim herself did not testify that she was kidnapped or sexually assaulted; the parents did not corroborate these allegations; and the medical examination report contained no evidence of penetrative sexual assault. The court concluded the prosecution's case "miserably failed" to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts