SMT. SHAYAMLI GHOSH AND OTHERS vs SRI KANAK GHOSH AND OTHERS — 65/2015

Case under All-india Services Act Section 123. Status: Awaiting Order from Upper Court. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Awaiting Order from Upper Court Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: WBSP070007322015

Filing Number

750/2015

Filing Date

02-Mar-2015

Registration No

65/2015

Registration Date

02-Mar-2015

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Last updated 09-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

All-india Services Act Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SHAYAMLI GHOSH AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI KANAK GHOSH AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  4. 28-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  5. 24-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

  6. 03-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  7. 18-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  8. 25-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Scc

  9. 20-Jun-2024

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  10. 19-Apr-2024

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  11. 18-Jan-2024

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  12. 22-Sep-2023

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  13. 01-Jul-2023

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  14. 01-Mar-2023

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  15. 14-Dec-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  16. 01-Nov-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  17. 16-Sep-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  18. 07-Jul-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  19. 15-Jun-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  20. 11-Apr-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  21. 21-Feb-2022

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  22. 11-Nov-2021

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  23. 26-Aug-2021

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  24. 08-Jul-2021

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  25. 29-Apr-2021

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  26. 20-Feb-2021

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  27. 10-Dec-2020

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  28. 09-Sep-2020

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  29. 29-Apr-2020

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  30. 11-Feb-2020

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  31. 19-Dec-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  32. 31-Oct-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  33. 17-Aug-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  34. 18-Jun-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  35. 11-Apr-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  36. 30-Jan-2019

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  37. 05-Oct-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  38. 14-Aug-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  39. 20-Jun-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  40. 25-Apr-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  41. 12-Mar-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  42. 03-Jan-2018

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  43. 30-Oct-2017

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  44. 05-Aug-2017

    Commissioner Report

    Scc

  45. 30-Jun-2017

    Restored

    Scc

  46. 30-Jul-2016

    Disposed

    Scc

  47. 30-Jul-2016

    Disposed

    Scc

  48. 27-Jul-2016

    Judgement

    Scc

  49. 12-Jul-2016

    Argument / Further Argument

    Scc

  50. 27-Jun-2016

    Argument / Further Argument

    Scc

  51. 20-Jun-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  52. 07-Jun-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  53. 20-May-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  54. 09-May-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  55. 18-Apr-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  56. 05-Apr-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  57. 14-Mar-2016

    Evidence of Defence Witness

    Scc

  58. 04-Mar-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  59. 22-Feb-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  60. 10-Feb-2016

    orderView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition to recall PW-1 to produce documents previously not submitted that are necessary for property adjudication in this suit. PW-1 was examined on recall, and cross-examination was declined. The case is adjourned to 22.02.2016 for the defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  61. 10-Feb-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  62. 03-Feb-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  63. 20-Jan-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  64. 06-Jan-2016

    orderView PDF

  65. 06-Jan-2016

    Evidence

    Scc

  66. 15-Dec-2015

    orderView PDF

  67. 15-Dec-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  68. 01-Dec-2015

    Hearing of Petition

    Scc

  69. 23-Nov-2015

    orderView PDF

  70. 23-Nov-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  71. 05-Oct-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  72. 30-Sep-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  73. 14-Sep-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  74. 07-Aug-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  75. 27-Jul-2015

    P.H

    Scc

  76. 26-Jun-2015

    Written Statement.

    Scc

  77. 11-Jun-2015

    Written Statement.

    Scc

  78. 06-Jun-2015

    Written Statement.

    Scc

  79. 19-May-2015

    orderView PDF

  80. 19-May-2015

    Written Statement.

    Scc

  81. 05-May-2015

    orderView PDF

  82. 05-May-2015

    Hearing of Petition

    Scc

  83. 20-Apr-2015

    Hearing of Petition

    Scc

  84. 25-Mar-2015

    orderView PDF

  85. 25-Mar-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  86. 02-Mar-2015

    orderView PDF

  87. 02-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition to recall PW-1 to produce documents previously not submitted that are necessary for property adjudication in this suit. PW-1 was examined on recall, and cross-examination was declined. The case is adjourned to 22.02.2016 for the defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case