SUNIL KR MAHATO vs ARINDAM DUTTAGUPTA — 206/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 12th May 2026.
Scc Suit
CNR: WBSP070006462021
Filing Number
650/2021
Filing Date
05-Mar-2021
Registration No
206/2021
Registration Date
05-Mar-2021
Court
Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas
Judge
7-Scc
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KR MAHATO
Adv. I GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARINDAM DUTTAGUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
orderView PDF
Case 206/2021 Summary: On 12/05/2026, the court dismissed the suit filed by Sunil Kr Mahato against Arindam Duttagupta for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the scheduled date without taking any preparatory steps, while the defendant appeared and filed hazira. The judge found the plaintiff unwilling to proceed and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
Scc
-
16-Mar-2026
Appearance
Scc
-
10-Feb-2026
orderView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Appearance
Scc
-
19-Jan-2026
Appearance
Scc
-
24-Dec-2025
Appearance
Scc
-
06-Dec-2025
Appearance
Scc
-
18-Nov-2025
Appearance
Scc
-
22-Sep-2025
Appearance
Scc
-
22-Sep-2025
Restored
Scc
-
21-Sep-2021
orderView PDF
-
21-Sep-2021
Disposed
Scc
-
16-Sep-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Scc
-
17-Aug-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Scc
-
12-Jul-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Scc
-
11-May-2021
orderView PDF
-
11-May-2021
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Scc
-
05-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 206/2021
Case 206/2021 Summary: On 12/05/2026, the court dismissed the suit filed by Sunil Kr Mahato against Arindam Duttagupta for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the scheduled date without taking any preparatory steps, while the defendant appeared and filed hazira. The judge found the plaintiff unwilling to proceed and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts