AGARWAL PIPE AND FITTING FIRM AND OTHERS vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD AND OTHERS — 33/2026

Case under Advocates Act Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

Mc - Misc Case

CNR: WBSP070004562026

Filing Number

437/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ-I

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AGARWAL PIPE AND FITTING FIRM AND OTHERS

    Adv. AVIRUP CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court rejected Agarwal Pipe and Fitting Firm's petition seeking rectification of the appellate court's order dated 04.02.2026. The petitioner argued the appellate court erroneously directed that the ad-interim injunction petition be heard with both parties present, claiming such petitions must be heard ex parte. The court found no clerical or arithmetical error in the appellate order and dismissed the rectification petition under Section 152 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ-I

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    orderView PDF

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Agarwal Pipe and Fitting Firm's petition seeking rectification of the appellate court's order dated 04.02.2026. The petitioner argued the appellate court erroneously directed that the ad-interim injunction petition be heard with both parties present, claiming such petitions must be heard ex parte. The court found no clerical or arithmetical error in the appellate order and dismissed the rectification petition under Section 152 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case