ANAND RAM TANDON vs RABI BOURI — 123/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070004502026

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

123/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND RAM TANDON

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RABI BOURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 123/2026 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Rabi Bouri) The court decreed Anand Ram Tandon's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan to Rabi Bouri on 30/03/2024. The defendant failed to appear; the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note established the loan obligation on demand. The defendant must repay within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Scc

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 123/2026 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Rabi Bouri) The court decreed Anand Ram Tandon's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan to Rabi Bouri on 30/03/2024. The defendant failed to appear; the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note established the loan obligation on demand. The defendant must repay within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was penalized Rs. 75/- for non-compliance with Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case