ANAND RAM TANDON vs PAWAN KR. MAHATO — 120/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 30th April 2026.

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070004472026

Case disposed

Filing Number

428/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-SCC

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

ANAND RAM TANDON

Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

PAWAN KR. MAHATO

Hearing History

Judge: 7-SCC

30-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Exparte Hearing

22-04-2026

Exparte Hearing

16-03-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

20-02-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
order

Summary of Case 120/2026 The court decreed Anand Ram Tandon's suit against Pawan Kr. Mahato for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 23/03/2023. The court found Tandon's unchallenged evidence and promissory note credible, accepting his claim that the loan was to be repaid on demand. Mahato was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, with liberty for execution if payment fails; however, the court imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 120/2026 The court decreed Anand Ram Tandon's suit against Pawan Kr. Mahato for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 23/03/2023. The court found Tandon's unchallenged evidence and promissory note credible, accepting his claim that the loan was to be repaid on demand. Mahato was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, with liberty for execution if payment fails; however, the court imposed a Rs. 75/- penalty on the plaintiff for non-compliance with the Bengal Money Lender's Act licensing requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case