ANAND RAM TANDON vs PAWAN KR. MAHATO — 119/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070004462026

Filing Number

427/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

119/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EXPARTE DECREE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND RAM TANDON

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KR. MAHATO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 119/2026 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Pawan Kr. Mahato) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to the defendant as an accommodation loan on 20/04/2023. The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence through the promissory note and testimony established the loan agreement with repayment on demand. The defendant was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, failing which execution proceedings may follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Scc

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 119/2026 (Anand Ram Tandon v. Pawan Kr. Mahato) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent to the defendant as an accommodation loan on 20/04/2023. The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence through the promissory note and testimony established the loan agreement with repayment on demand. The defendant was ordered to pay the decretal amount within three months, failing which execution proceedings may follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case