PAWAN KUMAR vs SOMENATH MUKHERJEE — 116/2026

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--Full Satisfaction on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Scc Suit

CNR: WBSP070004192026

Filing Number

402/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

116/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Sealdeh, South 24 Parganas

Judge

7-Scc

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Full Satisfaction

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1972 Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. INDRANI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOMENATH MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    orderView PDF

    Case 116/2026 Summary: The court decreed ex-parte against defendant Somenath Mukherjee in favor of petitioner Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 11/11/2023. The plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note proved the loan obligation on demand. The defendant must pay the decretal amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was penalized Rs. 75/- for failing to obtain a money lending license under the Bengal Money Lender's Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Scc

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    Scc

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Order

    Scc

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 116/2026 Summary: The court decreed ex-parte against defendant Somenath Mukherjee in favor of petitioner Pawan Kumar for recovery of Rs. 7,500/- lent as an accommodation loan on 11/11/2023. The plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and promissory note proved the loan obligation on demand. The defendant must pay the decretal amount within three months or face execution proceedings. The plaintiff was penalized Rs. 75/- for failing to obtain a money lending license under the Bengal Money Lender's Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case